When the world looks at groups like ISIS or the Islamic regime in Iran, the word “extremist” is often thrown around as if these groups are deviating from their faith. In reality, they are simply literalists. They are not interpreting the data in a vacuum; they are following a blueprint that leaves very little room for imagination. This is the primary difference between the Bible and the Quran. While the Bible reads like a collection of scattered short stories, the Quran functions as a structured textbook. It is a manual for conquest that details exactly how to bring the world to submission. It is not a “holy book” in the sense of moral guidance; it is a tactical manual for 7th-century colonial expansion.

If your God instructs you that a woman’s life is worth less than a man’s genitalia, following that instruction is not extremism in your mind. It is obedience. We see this same pattern in pre-Enlightenment Christianity. Without that period of intellectual secularization, the atrocities committed in the name of the Biblical God would have continued unabated. The difference is that today, the world doesn’t have the luxury of waiting centuries for another round of Enlightenment or a new set of Crusades. As I argued before, civilization is a choice, and relying on a 7th-century desert scripture is objectively the wrong one. Since we are short on time, military force remains the only language a regime of this nature actually respects.

The Scriptural Blueprint

The following points (not an exhaustive list) constitute the core legal components of the framework currently enforced by any Islamic regime following Sharia law. This is raw data, and I highly recommend you read various English translations of the same wording to understand how they have been whitewashed to keep the “Islamophobia” industry in business. You will see why the whitewashing is essential in advancing their agenda, where I explain what “Taqiyya” is.

• Marriage Discipline (Quran 4:34): Command to beat disobedient wives as the final step. The Arabic word literally translates to “beating.” Some translations shamelessly added “gently” as if there is a compassionate way to physically assault your spouse.
• Legal Testimony (Quran 2:282): Two women are required to equal one man’s witness because, according to this textbook, one woman will surely forget.
• Inheritance (Quran 4:11): A daughter’s share is legally fixed at exactly half of a son’s.
• War Captives (Quran 4:24): Permission for sex with married women captured in war.
• The Veil (Quran 33:59): Mandating covering so women are recognized and not “molested,” effectively putting the burden of men’s lack of self-control on the woman’s wardrobe.
• The “Tilth” (Quran 2:223): Defining women as “farmland” for men to “use as they will.”
• Child Marriage (Quran 65:4): Establishing the waiting period for girls who have not yet menstruated, implying menstruation (not age) as the green light to consummate the marriage.
• Cross-Amputation (Quran 5:33): Cutting off hands and feet from opposite sides as punishment for “mischief.”
• Slavery (Quran 23:5-6): Explicitly permitting sex with those “whom your right hands possess.” (More on slavery below.)
• Apostasy (Hadith Bukhari 6922): The direct order: “Whoever changes his religion, kill him.”
• Leadership (Hadith Bukhari 7099): The declaration that a nation led by a woman will never succeed. The prophet was butthurt seeing a female Persian queen.
• Intellectual Status (Hadith Bukhari 304): Labeling women as “deficient in intelligence and religion.”
• Refusing Sex (Hadith Muslim 1436): The claim that angels curse a woman until morning if she refuses her husband.
• Stoning (Hadith Bukhari 6830): The prescription of death by stoning for adultery.
• Human Value (Fiqh Tahrir al-Wasila): Legal rulings valuing a man’s testicle higher than a woman’s entire life.

The Weapon of Deceit: Taqiyya

To understand how this regime maintains its grip, one must understand the concept of Taqiyya. While lying is generally considered a sin in Islam, Taqiyya permits and even encourages Muslims to lie to non-Muslims to advance an Islamic agenda. This is exactly how Khomeini orchestrated Iran’s 1979 Islamic revolution. He fooled Jimmy Carter and secured Western backing by appearing as a moderate cleric who just wanted to pray in peace. Once his power was absolute, he discarded the mask and used the West’s own naivety to wipe out his opposition. The embarraced West claimed he was “radicalized,” but in reality, he simply stopped lying!

The 1988 Massacre

The ultimate realization of this ideology was the summer of 1988. Based on a fatwa from Khomeini, the regime executed 30,000 political prisoners in a single summer. There were children as young as 13 among them. The volume of victims was so massive that prisoners were loaded onto forklift trucks and hanged in batches of half a dozen every half hour. While the world remained quiet, this purge solidified the regime’s control.

The Legacy of Slavery and Submissiveness

The Quran includes specific instructions on treating slaves and sex captives. While many focus on the Trans-Atlantic trade, the Trans-Saharan slave trade was way more devastating (search “castrated” in that page). Unlike the West, the Arab Muslim world has not truly abolished the cultural framework of slavery because doing so would mean admitting their God was wrong.

Furthermore, Islam does not want smart people. It wants submissive ones. As I noted in my post on the bogus Islamic Golden Age, the structure of the faith is designed to suppress critical thinking in favor of total obedience while taking credit for the scientific achievements of the civilizations they conquered and eventually bled dry.

The Irony of the Host

There is a massive irony in how different groups of refugees interact with the West. Iranians assimilate, contribute, and grow with their hosts while respecting their heritage. Contrast them with the Palestinian and Muslim refugees in Europe who try to dominate their host countries. This brings to mind the Scottish-Korean influencer (find him on Instagram, he’s amazing) who consistently and rightfully asks the obvious question: there are over 50 Muslim countries in the world, so why did you leave if you wanted to live under Sharia? It’s a comedic masterpiece watching people flee a burning building only to try and set fire to the new one.

The answer is: that was the grand plan. They didn’t run away from Sharia law; they left their country to spread it. They lied in their asylum applications using the holy art of Taqiyya, claiming they were running away from “prosecution.” They weren’t running; they were “exported” to spread the seeds of Islam and bring all non-believers into submission. It follows the “Incubate, Multiply, Dominate” methodology of Muslim Arab colonialism I described in my previous post on Colony Wars.

Sophisticated Strategy, Not Naivety

The exceptional educational and economic standing of the Iranian diaspora proves that their calls for outside assistance are rooted in a sophisticated understanding of global leverage. With nearly 60% of Iranian-Americans holding a bachelor’s degree or higher and leading companies with a market cap exceeding $600 billion, these are not uninformed observers. They are CEOs, scientists, and policy experts. When they appeal for international intervention, it is a calculated recognition that the regime’s actions constitute a systematic destruction of a nation’s potential. They aren’t asking for a handout; they are asking for the removal of an occupier so they can rebuild their own country.

Why Iran is Not Iraq or Afghanistan

Critics often claim that intervention will turn Iran into the next Iraq or Afghanistan. This is a failure of pattern recognition. Iraq and Afghanistan are inherently Muslim countries. They were Muslims killing each other before the US arrived, and they remained Muslim countries killing their own after the US left. Nothing changed because the underlying disease remained the same.

Iran was a secular country before the Islamic Revolution. Islamists took over and started the slaughter. All that is required to fix the “problem” in Iran is the removal of theocracy. Once that 7th-century parasite is gone, the secular foundation is still there waiting to be reconnected to the modern world.

The “Selective Empathy” of the Left

While Iranians have been slaughtered by the tens of thousands over the last two months, the Western Left remained silent. We see activists with more pronouns than braincells screaming “Hands off the Middle East” now, but they were absent when the IRGC was filling the streets with blood. Groups, like Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Houthis, are branded as “resistance” by Western leftists who are either uneducated or morally bankrupt.

Under the Geneva Convention, a hospital is a protected site. However, the moment it is used as a military base or a weapons cache, that protection is nullified. Hamas has used that strategy in Gaza, and now the IRGC is using the exact playbook. The Left ignores the human shields and blames the person pulling the trigger.

Even the media like the New York Timeswill mourn the death of a tyrant like Khamenei, calling him a “Cleric Who Made Iran a Regional Power,” while ignoring the fact that he was leading a systematic genocide against his own people. That’s like saying “Führer Adolf Hitler, Dog-Loving Artist Who Made Germany a World Power, Is Dead at 56” on April 30, 1945.

The Nuclear Paradox and the Price of Liberation

The regime’s followers believe they are good people because they want to send everyone to heaven according to their God’s order, as discussed in my post on Heaven: The Enemy of Justice. This is the ultimate danger of a nuclear-armed theocracy. If you believe this life is a shadow, pressing a button to send everyone to heaven is an act of salvation. They aren’t “evil” in their own heads; they are “saints” trying to fast-track your entry into paradise.

For months, Iranians have been up against a government armed to the teeth. The plea for outside help wasn’t born of naivety, but of necessity. Iranians are a sophisticated people. They know that outside military intervention comes with a heavy price and devastating collateral damage.

However, much like France in World War II, there comes a point where no amount of internal strength is enough to dislodge a genocidal occupier. When the choice is between a systematic slaughter by your own “divine” leaders or the messy, painful intervention of outsiders, the choice is clear.

Khamenei followed every bloody step of Khomeini, but the mask has finally slipped. Iranians are currently celebrating his death all over the world. This celebration is the natural reaction of a people finally seeing the end of a regime that has used 7th-century divinity to justify 21st-century genocide. The transition has begun. The only question left is whether the world will help them finish the job or keep making excuses for the executioners.

The Final Mandate: Finish the Job

The world must understand that there is no “middle ground” with a wounded theocracy. If the US and Israel pull out now, or call for a premature ceasefire before the IRGC is completely dismantled, they are not “bringing peace.” They are handing a knife back to a cornered killer. The IRGC is currently a wounded wolf, and a wounded wolf is at its most “divine” when it is backed into a corner. If they are left with even a fragment of their power, they will spend it all on a systematic massacre of the Iranian people that will make 1988 look like a rehearsal.

A ceasefire at this stage is a death warrant for every Iranian who dared to dance in the streets at the news of the dictator’s death. Civilization is a choice, but so is survival. The job is not done until the IRGC as an institution is erased from the earth. To stop now is to invite a genocide in the name of God.

————————

Some useful links:

• Human Rights Watch (January 16, 2026): Iran: Growing Evidence of Countrywide Massacres. This report documents evidence of security forces carrying out large-scale killings starting on January 8, 2026, with many victims suffering gunshot wounds to the head and torso.
• Center for Human Rights in Iran (February 25, 2026): Iran’s Machinery of Repression Escalates. Detailed reporting on the surge in arbitrary arrests, torture, and enforced disappearances following the January massacres. The report highlights the systematic use of death sentences as a tool of political suppression.
• GeoConfirmed (2026): Iran Conflict Tracking. Provides geospatial verification of military strikes and civilian massacres. Recent data geolocated strikes on IRGC infrastructure and documented civilian casualties in residential areas during the 2026 conflict.